Ratchaphol Lawyer" reported to investigate. "Kim Ruangkrai" ITV's shareholder meeting record document Contrary to the video clips that were published. Is it a false report - forgery of documents?
At 10:00 a.m., Mr. Ratchaphon Sirisakorn, a lawyer, brought documentary evidence to report the case at Thung Song Hong Police Station to investigate Mr. Kim Siritaweechai, Managing Director of Intouch Holdings Public Company Limited and Mr. Ruangkrai Leekitwattana, a member of the Palang Pracharat Party. In case of recording of the 2023 ITV Annual General Meeting of Shareholders held on April 26, that contradicts the video clips that were published that it is a false report and forgery of documents or not
Mr. Ratchaphon said that in the past there were arguments between many parties. He saw it and asked to represent the village, a good citizen, to report it. Because he saw anomalies, the published documents contained suspiciousness and anomalies in 3 issues: 1. Video clips and recording documents did not match. 2. Mr. Chaturong Sukiad stated that the file was deleted after the meeting. I don't know why I deleted it. Really delete? 3. Mr. Kim issued a letter telling other agencies to check the meeting documents. even though he was the one who signed it and chaired the meeting Must know the whole story and does not require anyone to verify Mr. Kim himself should come out and clarify. But the fact that Mr. Kim did not clarify Instead, throwing it to other people to check is a waste of time and distraction. And look at if there is a forgery of documents. which must be punished
In the case of Mr. Ruangkrai that previously said Didn't go and submit the document to the Election Commission, which is something that no one knows whether to submit or not submit. want the police to check that really filed or not which, if actually filed He saw that it was deliberately bullying others to be punished or not. which would like the police to investigate as well
As for the offenses reported today that a false report is an offense under section 137 of the Criminal Code which may cause others or damaged people must be imprisoned for a term of not more than 6 months or a fine of not more than 1,000 baht or both.” Are the minutes of the meeting false? and fall into the category of those who make fake documents will be guilty according to the Criminal Code, Section 264, with imprisonment of not more than 3 years or a fine of not more than 60,000 baht, or both.
After this If Mr. Kim Or Mr. Rueangklai will sue back, he is not afraid Because it is the right of a citizen who sees something wrong and wants it to be investigated. As for what he did not submit to the Election Commission of Thailand for inspection, he saw that it was a delay in work because if the Election Commission of Thailand inspected and found an offense, he had to report it to the police station as well, which he reported today. Investigators can immediately retrieve documents from relevant agencies.
Source: Thai News Agency